Monofilament and Multifilament Tennis Strings

With the development in synthetic tennis strings technology came the introduction of more variety in materials. Today, many quality synthetics are topping sales and are even being used by professional tennis players and Grand Slam winners on tours – exclusively or in combination with natural gut. To date, we already have an endless number of different construction types that range from monofilament to multifilament tennis strings. And this article explores the difference between these two extremes and the advantages and disadvantages of each.

Monofilament Tennis Strings

The first set of synthetics, made of nylon, was made in this basic construction. As the name suggests, a monofilament is composed of a single solid piece of string which may be made entirely of one type of material or a composite of two or more. Coming in solid single strands, monofilaments are tougher –offering more resilience which to many players equate to playability. Some of the most popular monofilament strings today, used by pros, contain elements like aluminium, copper, tungsten, or titanium, all of which are added to enhance the pace of playing shots.

Monofilament tennis strings, simply put, means power. This is well reflected in the names that top manufacturers are giving their monofilament brands. Given their compactness, this is the more durable option over multifilament synthetics. However, this type is poor at shock absorption causing the arm to take in the vibrations which makes it an impractical choice for players with arm problems. Monofilaments are notorious for losing tension much quicker than multifilament synthetic or natural gut. Even before the strings themselves break, performance will inevitably decrease needing regular restringing to take full advantage of the power that monofilaments offer.

Multifilament Tennis Strings

In many aspects, multifilament synthetics are the exact opposite of their monofilament counterpart. Made up of a number of bundles of synthetic microfibers twisted and bonded together, this option is the closest thing to natural gut performance-wise. Generally classified as “soft” strings, multifilament strings are all about touch and control. The hundreds or thousands of microfibers provides a cushioning effect, making it a great shock absorber. Soft and comfortable (minus the high cost of natural gut), this construction is recommended and practical for players suffering from arm problems. On the downside, like gut, regular use causes multifilament tennis strings to fray.

In conclusion, the choice of monofilament tennis strings over multifilament, or vise-versa, is a personal decision depending on the player’s game and preference. Generally, the durability-oriented monofilament construction is best for constant string breakers as well as power-players who do not mind the high initial tension loss and dead feel. For players suffering from elbow problems, multifilament strings are the obvious choice. If comfort is a crucial factor, then multifilament string sets offer the best possible touch and control. Some tennis players use a durable monofilament for the main string, balanced with a softer multifilament synthetic to achieve the full benefit of each tennis string construction. There are also others who string their mains and crosses with the same synthetic construction, with an adjustment to the tensions. Stringing, simply put, is a matter of personalization.


Categorised in: